Cases 11 - 20 of 216
Markham YoungIn re: Markham Young
as 23-12298
Petitioner:
In re: MARKHAM W. YOUNG
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv50131
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Young v. Meisner
as 2:2023cv00352
Petitioner:
Xavier W Young
Respondent:
Warden Michael Meisner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lamm et al v. Hall et al
as 5:2022cv01961
Plaintiff:
Megan K. Lamm and Haley M. Lamm
Defendant:
Judge Rosemarie A. Hall, Guardian ad Litem Nikki L. Reed, Attorney Susan J. Lax and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Young v. Wyoming Attorney General et al
as 2:2022cv00181
Respondent:
Park County Sheriff, Wyoming Attorney General, Scott Steward and others
Petitioner:
Michael W Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Schroll v. Wilson et al
as 6:2022cv00145
Plaintiff:
Shelly Schroll
Defendant:
Allen W. Wilson, Joseph G. Braden, Keith W. Young, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv50222
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jackie Barnes, et al v. USA
as 22-5495
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JACKIE SUE BARNES, CHRISTOPHER W. BEAM, SANDRA A. BEAM and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv01126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
LeBlanc v. United States Postal Service et al
as 4:2022cv00695
Plaintiff:
Felton LeBlanc
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and Howard W Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
