Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 39
COBBLE v. ABRAMS et al
as 1:2017mc00017
Plaintiff: DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
Defendant: LESLIE ABRAMS, W LOUIS SANDS and US GOVERNMENT
Ricky Giddens, et al v. Hugh Lawson, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-10169
Plaintiff - Appellant: RICKY GIDDENS and LYDIA GIDDENS
Defendant - Appellee: HUGH LAWSON, Senior District Judge, W. LOUIS SANDS, Senior District Judge, THOMAS Q. LANGSTAFF, Magistrate Judge and others
BRADSHAW v. TREADWELL et al
as 7:2016cv00188
Plaintiff: SIGFRID N BRADSHAW
Defendant: MARC T TREADWELL and W LOUIS SANDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keith Henderson v. James Graham
as 16-6967
Plaintiff - Appellant: KEITH HENDERSON
Defendant - Appellee: JAMES E. GRAHAM, STEPHEN J. MURPHY, III, A. BISHOP and others
Keith Henderson v. James Graham We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-7260
Plaintiff - Appellant: KEITH HENDERSON
Defendant - Appellee: JAMES E. GRAHAM, STEPHEN J. MURPHY, III, A. BISHOP and others
GIDDENS et al v. LAWSON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2015cv00099
Plaintiff: RICKY GIDDENS and LYDIA GIDDENS
Defendant: HUGH LAWSON, W LOUIS SANDS, THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Charles Leverette v. State of Georgia, et al
as 15-12162
Plaintiff - Appellant: CHARLES LEVERETTE
Defendant - Appellee: STATE OF GEORGIA and W. LOUIS SANDS, Judge
Henderson v. Graham et al
as 5:2015ct03003
Plaintiff: Keith Henderson
Defendant: James E. Graham, Stephen J. Murphy, III, A. Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heard et al v. Deal et al
as 2:2014cv00179
Plaintiff: Robert Heard
Defendant: Nathan Deal, Doug Collins, G.B.I. Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Graham et al
as 8:2014cv01854
Plaintiff: Keith Henderson
Defendant: James E. Graham, HuLane E. George, Joy D. Honeycut and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?