Cases 11 - 20 of 167
Hall v. DAC Prison et al
as 5:2023ct03251
Plaintiff:
Adam Wade Hall and Abdul Al Kareem Muhammad
Defendant:
DAC Prison and Raymond Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. North Carolina Department of Adult Correction et al
as 5:2023ct03226
Plaintiff:
Adam Wade Hall
Defendant:
North Carolina Department of Adult Correction, Sgt. William Owens, Joshua Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HALL v. NORTH CAROLINA ADULT CORRECTION et al
as 1:2023cv00543
Plaintiff:
ADAM WADE HALL
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA ADULT CORRECTION, SGT WILLIAM OWENS, JOSHUA ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Walston et al
as 5:2023ct03056
Plaintiff:
Derek J. Miller
Defendant:
Wade Walston, Mr. Sauls, T. Peele and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STRATTON v. CITY OF KANNAPOLIS et al
as 1:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
KATHY STRATTON
Defendant:
CITY OF KANNAPOLIS, J. M. LIVENGOOD, M. T. HOEHMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Parsons v. Sullivan et al
as 5:2023ct03020
Plaintiff:
Daniel B. Parsons
Defendant:
Nicole Sullivan, Todd Ishee, Gary Junker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Braddy et al
as 5:2023ct03002
Plaintiff:
David Anthony Harris
Defendant:
Doctor Braddy, Wade Walston, Michael A. Hardee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HALL v. MCLAIN
as 1:2022cv01009
Plaintiff:
ADAM WADE HALL
Defendant:
JAMES MCCAIN and JAMES MCLAIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wade v. USA
as 4:2022cv00124
Petitioner:
Raekwon Michael Jerome Wade
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
WADE v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2022cv00811
Plaintiff:
MARSHA WADE
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
