Cases 11 - 20 of 77
OWL FEATHER-GORBEY v. WARDEN FCI BECKLEY, W. VA et al
as 1:2021cv03221
Petitioner:
MICHAEL S. OWL FEATHER-GORBEY
Respondent:
WARDEN FCI BECKLEY, W. VA, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
GORBEY v WARDEN
as 1:2021cv01570
Respondent:
WARDEN OF USP-LEWISBURG
Petitioner:
MICHAEL OWL FEATHER GORBEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SIMPSON v. WARDEN OF DC CENTRAL DETENTION FACILITY
as 1:2020cv03415
Defendant:
WARDEN OF DC CENTRAL DETENTION FACILITY
Plaintiff:
JESSE RUSSELL SIMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
COLLIER v. BURNES et al
as 1:2020cv02701
Defendant:
DANIEL T. FLOYD, BALDEN D. POLK, DANNY OLIPHANT and others
Plaintiff:
DARRON LASHAWN COLLIER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
BROWN v. CAUGHRON et al
as 1:2020cv01184
Defendant:
WARDEN ZOOK, S.A. CAUGHRON, MAJOR KING and others
Plaintiff:
MILTON BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
BOBKA v. WARDEN et al
as 1:2020cv01090
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, MICHAEL CARVAJAL, WARDEN and others
Petitioner:
MICHAEL BOBKA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SIMPSON v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISON et al
as 1:2019cv03173
Defendant:
CHAPLAIN OF CANAAN USP, IAN CONNORS, C. GOMEZ and others
Plaintiff:
JESSE RUSSELL SIMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BAILEY v. BISHOP et al
as 1:2019cv03178
Petitioner:
THOMAS LEE BAILEY
Defendant:
MARYLAND ATTORNEY GEN, NBCI WARDEN FRANK BISHOP, MARYLAND ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
BANKS v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK et al
as 1:2019cv03044
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and WARDEN
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ROSEBORO v. RICKARD
as 1:2019cv02355
Petitioner:
RAYMOND R. ROSEBORO
Respondent:
WARDEN and BARBARA RICKARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
