Cases 11 - 20 of 87
Smith v. Carvallo et al
as 5:2023cv00084
Plaintiff:
Orlando Smith
Defendant:
Fernando Carvallo, PA Bolaji Aremu, Nurse West Joeal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LINDSEY v. MYERS et al
as 5:2023cv00378
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP RAY LINDSEY
Defendant:
WARDEN DARRIN MYERS, WARDEN JEFFRIES, WARDEN JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Bradly et al
as 4:2023cv00222
Plaintiff:
Stevie Allen
Defendant:
Bradly, Warden Jones and CO II Mucconer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Creel v. Junker et al
as 5:2023ct03243
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ray Creel
Defendant:
Gary Junker, Dr. Arthur Campbell, Debra Fitzgerald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mooney v. Howell et al
as 5:2023ct03239
Plaintiff:
Rufus M. Mooney
Defendant:
Superintendent Howell, Associate Warden Williams and Associate Warden Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Short et al
as 1:2023cv02771
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Thomas
Defendant:
Sgt. Short, Sgt. Brown, Warden Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STANLEY v. WARD et al
as 5:2023cv00204
Plaintiff:
ALVIN STANLEY
Defendant:
TIMOTHY C WARD, WARDEN WHITENTIN, WARDEN BARNETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes v. Odum et al
as 5:2023cv00028
Plaintiff:
John Hughes
Defendant:
Warden Roy Odum, Warden Cox, Warden Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBINSON v. ODUM et al
as 7:2023cv00046
Plaintiff:
QUANTOVIA ROBINSON
Defendant:
Warden ODUM, Warden JONES, Warden COX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cameron v. Hamm et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00059
Plaintiff:
Leslie D. Cameron and Leslie Dewayne Cameron
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm, Warden Thompkins, Warden Lamar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
