Cases 11 - 20 of 56
James Ferrell v. Josh Sparkman, et al
as 20-5515
Defendant / Appellee:
NORMA MCGEE OGLE, Military hearing officer, LISA ZAVOGIANNIS, JUSTIN WALLING and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES EVERETT FERRELL
Wilson v. Mount Diablo Unified School District/Special Education Local Plan Area (Diablo) et al
as 3:2020cv03368
Defendant:
City of Concord, Jose A. Espinoza, Darryl R. Saffold and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Geary Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frederick Avery v. Cheryl Blackburn, et al
as 20-5490
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN H. PEAY, SOPHIA S. LEE, JUDGE JOE M. TIPTON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FREDERICK AVERY
Avery v. Blackburn et al
as 1:2020cv00018
Defendant:
Clinton J. Morgan, Melissa Roberge, Rob Mcguire and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick Alexander Avery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WEDEMEYER v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2019cv19773
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE WEDEMEYER
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC.
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ferrell v. Sparkman et al
as 4:2019cv00067
Defendant:
William M Locke, TENNESSEE HIGHWAY PATROL ADMINISTRATION, JAMIE GIBSON and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES EVERETT FERRELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FERRELL v. SPARKMAN et al
as 3:2019cv00840
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, TENNESSEE HIGHWAY PATROL ADMINISTRATION, JAMIE GIBSON and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES EVERETT FERRELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FERRELL v. SPARKMAN et al
as 1:2019cv02269
Defendant:
STATE OF TENNESSEE, TENNESSEE HIGHWAY PATROL ADMINISTRATION, JAMIE GIBSON and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES EVERETT FERRELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WEDEMEYER v 3M COMPANY
as 3:2019cv01053
Plaintiff:
BRIAN WEDEMEYER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
