Cases 11 - 20 of 27
BUSH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv55490
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM BUSH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BUSH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv53321
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM BUSH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BUSH v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE et al
as 1:2020cv00068
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM BUSH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
BUSH v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2019cv18413
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM BUSH and THE ESTATE OF JULIE BUSH
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES INC.
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BUSH v. MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION et al
as 2:2019cv02468
Defendant:
NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION, TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., NOVARTIS VACCINES AND DIAGNOSTICS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM BUSH, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lenny's Franchise Systems, LLC v. Bush et al
as 2:2016cv02087
Plaintiff:
Lenny's Franchise Systems, LLC
Defendant:
Herbert William Bush, Jr., David Bonfiglio and Sub Nation LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
William Bush v. Victor Brooks et al
as 2:2015cv09089
Defendant:
Crystal Brooks, Victor Brooks and Does
Plaintiff:
William Bush
William Bush v. Warden, Southern Ohio Correct
as 13-4352
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM BUSH
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN, SOUTHERN OHIO CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Bush v. Thomas et al (DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2012cv00345
Plaintiff:
William Bush
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas , Luther Strange and Anthony Patterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
