Cases 11 - 20 of 57
BOUGHNER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv10135
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM STANLEY BOUGHNER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mounts et al v. 3M Company et al
as 7:2021cv00086
Defendant:
3M Company, Network Supply, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Mounts, Larry Epling, Mabel Epling and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Brett v. Trump et al
as 1:2021cv01383
Defendant:
John Thents, Mr. Brenichre, Carl Thume and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Brett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Racketeering (RICO) Act
STANLEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv24047
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM STANLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stanley v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc. et al
as 5:2021cv00072
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson, Inc.
Plaintiff:
William Stanley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States v. Stanley
as 20-6196
Defendant / Appellant:
WILLIAM STANLEY
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Stanley v. Frock et al
as 1:2020cv02258
Defendant:
B. Frock and C.O. Smith
Plaintiff:
Damon William Stanley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STANLEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv44335
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM STANLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stanley v. ConocoPhillips
as 3:2020cv00340
Plaintiff:
William Stanley
Defendant:
ConocoPhillips, Inc. and ConocoPhillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WILLIAMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv22928
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM STANLEY WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
