Cases 11 - 20 of 412
Danenberg v. Perry
as 1:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Robert A. Danenberg
Defendant:
Warden James Kevin Perry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jesse Lee Sykes v. James Hill
as 2:2023cv10914
Petitioner:
Jesse Lee Sykes
Respondent:
Warden James Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Abhimanyu Batra v. James Engelman
as 2:2023cv10394
Petitioner:
Abhimanyu Batra
Respondent:
Warden James Engelman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Daniel Woods v. Warden James T Vaughn Correctional Center, et al
as 23-3161
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL M. WOODS
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER and ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE
Melody v. Hill
as 3:2023cv06210
Defendant:
sean melody and Warden James Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
v. Melody et al
as 3:2023mc80308
Defendant:
Sean Melody and Warden James Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carmichael v. Earl et al
as 6:2023cv06124
Plaintiff:
Michael Shannon Carmichael
Defendant:
Warden James Earl, Sgt Voss, Correctional Officer John Doe #1 & #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carmichael v. Earl et al
as 6:2023cv06125
Plaintiff:
Michael Shannon Carmichael and C-Mike
Defendant:
Warden James Earl, Annitta Young, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Collins v. Shipman et al
as 5:2023cv05211
Petitioner:
Kingrale Collins
Respondent:
Warden James Shipman and Deputy Warden Maurice Culcloger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Derrick Smith v. Warden James T Vaughn Correctional Center, et al
as 23-3023
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DERRICK SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER and ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
