Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Yancey v. Warden, USP Terre Haute
as 2:2017cv00860
Petitioner:
Joshua Yancey
Respondent:
Warden, USP Terre Haute
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Yancey v. Warden, USP Terre Haute
as 1:2017cv00663
Petitioner:
Joshua Yancey
Respondent:
Warden, USP Terre Haute
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WESTINE v. USP-TERRE HAUTE
as 2:2017cv00279
Respondent:
WARDEN, USP-TERRE HAUTE
Petitioner:
JOHN G. WESTINE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
FORD V. WARDEN
as 2:2017cv00093
Petitioner:
KELVIN FORD
Respondent:
WARDEN USP TERRE HAUTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CLARK v. WARDEN
as 2:2015cv00246
Petitioner:
GEORGE CLARK
Respondent:
WARDEN, USP TERRE HAUTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JONES v. WARDEN, U.S.P. Terre Haute
as 2:2015cv00053
Petitioner:
NATHANIEL EUGENE JONES
Respondent:
WARDEN, USP TERRE HAUTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SPENCER v. WARDEN, USP TERRE HAUTE
as 2:2015cv00036
Petitioner:
ADDONES SPENCER
Respondent:
WARDEN, USP TERRE HAUTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
FIELDS v. USP TERRE HAUTE
as 2:2014cv00315
Petitioner:
SHERMAN LAMONT FIELDS
Respondent:
WARDEN USP TERRE HAUTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jesse Yarborough v. J. Norwood, et al
as 14-55785
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JESSE YARBOROUGH
Defendant - Appellee:
J. L. NORWOOD, JESUS FERNANDEZ, Medical Doctor, T. CINTORA, Counselor and others
Defendant:
FRANCISCO J. QUINTANA, Official Capacity, BROUGHTON, Case Manager, Official Capacity, R. KRIK, Officer, Official Capacity and others
Echols v. Warden USP Terre Haute
as 4:2013cv01858
Petitioner:
Demon Echols
Respondent:
Warden USP Terre Haute
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
