Cases 11 - 20 of 336
Carter v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
Harold Anthony Carter
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Carter v. Bullard et al
as 5:2024ct03013
Plaintiff:
John Carter
Defendant:
Jamie Bullard, Marc A. McPherson and Sgt. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02006
Petitioner:
Dontae Carter
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Moore, et al. v. Compass Group USA, Inc., et al.
as 3:2023cv00818
Plaintiff:
George Moore, Virginia Carter and James Jilek
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Francis Jaye and Sean Madelmayer
Defendant:
Compass Group USA, Inc. doing business as Canteen
Consolidated Defendant:
Does 1 through 50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Carter v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01565
Plaintiff:
Frances Carter
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00558
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
SEALY et al v. OLD DOMINION FREIGHT LINE, INC.
as 1:2023cv00819
Plaintiff:
DAVID K. SEALY, KERRY CARTER and HARVEY L. DAVIS
Defendant:
OLD DOMINION FREIGHT LINE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00599
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
CARTER v. DOE
as 1:2023cv00768
Plaintiff:
KEITH CARTER
Defendant:
W-S POLICE OFFICER JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lane v. Cooper et al
as 5:2023ct03259
Plaintiff:
Jaquan Alexander Lane
Defendant:
Billy Cooper, Charles Cooper, Officer Dzukiti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
