Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Lackey v. USA
as 5:2014cv00054
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Gary Richard Lackey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Alexander v. Barrero et al
as 5:2012cv00190
Plaintiff:
Lewis Eugene Alexander, Jr.
Defendant:
Julia Barrero, Tom Watson, Aaron Barlow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lackey v. United States of America et al
as 5:2011ct03230
Plaintiff:
Wesley Lackey
Defendant:
United States of America and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brown v. Lackey et al
as 3:2011cv00414
Petitioner:
William Arthur Brown
Respondent:
Sydney Jerome Lackey, Charlie T. Davis, Luke J. Donahue and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoffer-McCoy v. Tote et al
as 5:2011cv00134
Plaintiff:
Donna Hoffer-McCoy
Defendant:
John Tote , Larry Lackey , The Mental Health Association in NC, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Lackey et al v. Hickory Springs Manufacturing Company et al
as 5:2010cv00122
Plaintiff:
T. Steven Lackey , Sharyn Lackey and J. Keith Stokes
Defendant:
Hickory Springs Manufacturing Company, Valle Foam Industries, Inc., Domfoam International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Lackey v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
as 5:2010cv00030
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Randy D. Lackey
Cause Of Action: Diversity - Notice of Removal
Lackey v. Macon County, North Carolina
as 2:2009cv00042
Plaintiff:
Maureen Lackey
Defendant:
Macon County, North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cv Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
Brown v. USA
as 5:2009cv00048
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Brooks Thomas Lackey Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Anderson et al v. City of Gastonia
as 3:2007cv00510
Plaintiff:
Jim Anderson, Georgia Anderson, Eddie Atkinson and others
Defendant:
City of Gastonia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
