Cases 11 - 20 of 32
WASHINGTON v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2018cv00338
Plaintiff:
JEROME JUNIOR WASHINGTON
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT GILMORE, LACKEY and CITY OF PITTSBURGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2017cv01544
Plaintiff:
KEVIN SMITH
Defendant:
ROBERT GILMORE, MARK DIALESSANDRO, DSCS, ADAM SEDLOCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WASHINGTON v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2017cv00988
Plaintiff:
JEROME JUNIOR WASHINGTON
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT GILMORE, LACKEY, SEDLOCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BURKHART v. LACKEY et al
as 2:2017cv00906
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BURKHART
Defendant:
MS. LACKEY, ROBERT GILMORE, JOHN WETZEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCHULMERICH BELLS, LLC v. JEFFERS HANDBELL SUPPLY, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv00275
Plaintiff:
SCHULMERICH BELLS, LLC
Defendant:
JEFFERS HANDBELL SUPPLY, INC. and SHAWN L. LACKEY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
WOODS v. MALANOSKI et al
as 2:2017cv00017
Plaintiff:
JEROME CARLTON WOODS
Defendant:
MAUREEN MALANOSKI, CANDICE LACKEY, DAVID E. ZETWO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
LACKEY v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 2:2015cv04557
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LACKEY
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON and JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv00415
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
MAYON v. CAPPOZZA et al
as 2:2014cv01203
Plaintiff:
MICKY MAYON
Defendant:
MARK CAPPOZZA, ROCHELLE KING, COLIN FISCHETTI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MASON et al v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2013cv05163
Plaintiff:
FLORENCE ELIZABETH MASON, VINCENT T. MASON, JR. and CRYSTAL MASON
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT, CHARLES H. RAMSEY, JOHN FLEMING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
