Cases 201 - 210 of 451
WELTCH et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2020cv03432
Plaintiff:
MATT DELATOUR, KARLY SOLDNER, NINA FROGGATT and others
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-100 and CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RAMBERT v. ESTOCK
as 2:2020cv00948
Respondent:
LEE ESTOCK and ATTORNEY GENERAL JOSH SHAPIRO
Petitioner:
ERIC X. RAMBERT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lenchick v. Easter
as 3:2020cv00905
Petitioner:
Josh Lenchick
Respondent:
Warden D. Easter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dupree v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2020cv00878
Respondent:
John E. Wetzel, Lawrence S. Krasner and Josh Shapiro
Petitioner:
Nicholas Dupree
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BRAXTON v. PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT ATTORNEY LARRY KRASNER et al
as 2:2020cv02503
Respondent:
PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT ATTORNEY LARRY KRASNER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF JOSH SHAPIRO
Petitioner:
FRANK BRAXTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Haight v. Harry et al
as 3:2020cv00788
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office, Jeanna Longo, Kenneth Osokow and others
Petitioner:
William Haight
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
KINARD v. SCI FAYETTE et al
as 2:2020cv02047
Respondent:
SCI FAYETTE, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF JOSH SHAPIRO and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA
Petitioner:
KEITH KINARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Noel v. Wolf et al
as 4:2020cv00430
Defendant:
Josh Shapiro, Robert Marsh and Tom Wolf
Plaintiff:
Harold W. Noel, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WANAMAKER v. SMITH et al
as 2:2020cv01332
Respondent:
BARRY SMITH and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA JOSH SHAPIRO
Petitioner:
LAMARR WANAMAKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jackson v. Helfrich et al
as 1:2020cv00399
Defendant:
Officer Troy Cromer, York County Police Department, Alisa Litavidis and others
Plaintiff:
Franklin Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
