Cases 231 - 240 of 16,177
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv03048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Garza v. Kleine et al
as 8:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Garza
Defendant:
Donald Kleine, Douglas County Attorney Huelskamp and John E. Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Welch v. Officer Wooster #1863 et al
as 4:2024cv03038
Plaintiff:
Brendan Welch
Defendant:
Officer Wooster #1863, Officer Barone #1853, Lancaster County Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Rogers v. National Action Network Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv03037
Plaintiff:
Kevin Rogers
Defendant:
National Action Network Inc., Alfred Charles Sharpton, Jr., Peter Joseph Gleason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
King v. United State of America et al
as 8:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Nicholas E King and Nicholas E. King
Defendant:
United State of America and Connie Kallsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Copeland v. TD Ameritrade Holding Corporation et al
as 8:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Bruce Dwain Copeland
Defendant:
TD Ameritrade Holding Corporation and Charles Schwab Corporation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03252
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Maes v. Pillen et al
as 8:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Mourad Karim Maes
Defendant:
Jim Pillen and Mike Hilgers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sipple v. Kramer et al
as 4:2024cv03045
Plaintiff:
Adam T Sipple
Defendant:
Deputy Roland Kramer and Devin Ruff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cody v. Jeffreys
as 8:2024cv00045
Petitioner:
Gregory S. Cody
Respondent:
Rob Jeffreys
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
