Cases 21 - 30 of 380
Wright v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01056
Plaintiff:
Joseph Wright
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Estes v. Wright
as 5:2023ct03175
Plaintiff:
Gloria Hughes Estes
Defendant:
Officer Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Beard et al
as 1:2023cv00153
Plaintiff:
Raymond Kieth Wright, II
Defendant:
Zachary Beard, Michael Lolley, Matthew Parce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WRIGHT v. [FNU] CO. DANFORD
as 1:2023cv00456
Plaintiff:
KAYIE SHAUNE WRIGHT
Defendant:
[FNU] CO. DANFORD, JOHN DOE, [FNU] ATKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RAGGIO v. DAVIS et al
as 1:2023cv00430
Plaintiff:
TARAS N. RAGGIO
Defendant:
SHERIFF CHRIS DAVIS, SHERIFF ALFRED CHIP HUGHES, SHERIFF ENNIS WRIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00431
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Wright v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01020
Plaintiff:
Larry Wright
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Etienne v. Sanders et al
as 5:2023cv00214
Respondent:
KAREN REA PERKINS, MACHELLE SANDERS, TAMMIE ELAINE HALL and others
Petitioner:
DINEEN CHERYLANN ETIENNE
Defendant:
Reserve at Carrington Place
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
USA Farm Labor, Inc. v. Su, et al
as 1:2023cv00096
Plaintiff:
USA Farm Labor, Inc., JCP Farms, LLC, Lazy BS Bar, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Julie Su, Brent Parton and Brian Pasternak
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
