Cases 21 - 30 of 544
HILL v. I.M.P.D
as 1:2023cv02220
Plaintiff:
LARRY E. HILL
Defendant:
I.M.P.D
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
OHLEMEYER v. FAST FUND LENDING et al
as 1:2023cv02143
Defendant:
RAYCEN RAINES, III, FAST FUND LENDING, WAKPAMNI LAKE COMMUNITY CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
DANA OHLEMEYER
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
HILL v. BORGES
as 3:2023cv00197
Plaintiff:
LARRY E. HILL
Defendant:
LISA BORGES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HILL v. SCOTT
as 3:2023cv00192
Plaintiff:
LARRY E. HILL
Defendant:
COREY L. SCOTT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARTWELL v. BAXTER INTERNATIONAL et al
as 1:2023cv02096
Plaintiff:
Judy Hartwell, individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Benjamin Hartwell, Deceased and JUDY HARTWELL
Defendant:
INC. BAXTER INTERNATIONAL, INC. HILL-ROM COMPANY, The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
WHEATLEY v. BRYD et al
as 1:2023cv02058
Plaintiff:
RAY EDWARD WHEATLEY, JR. and ROY EDWARD WHEATLEY, JR.
Defendant:
SAMUEL BRYD, CENTURION, BEDWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. MADDY et al
as 2:2023cv00506
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
MADDY, PEACH, ERIC HILL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HILL v. I.M.P.D
as 3:2023cv00217
Plaintiff:
LARRY E. HILL
Defendant:
I.M.P.D
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HILL v. BORGES et al
as 3:2023cv00191
Plaintiff:
LARRY ELVIS HILL
Defendant:
LISA BORGES, RDC RECEPTION DIAGNOSTIC CENTER and SCOTT BLACKMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HILL v. BRYANT et al
as 3:2023cv00196
Plaintiff:
LARRY E. HILL
Defendant:
TERRY L. BRYANT and ATTORNEY GENERALS OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
