Cases 21 - 30 of 1,370
Jones v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00239
Plaintiff:
Lisa Jones
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Brooks v. Howard et al
as 5:2024ct03063
Plaintiff:
Darius Tremayne Brooks
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Howard, Sgt. Johnson, Sgt. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00206
Plaintiff:
Sharon Lynn Jones
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
McElwee v. Aldersgate Life Plan Services, Inc et al
as 3:2024cv00288
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lloyd McElwee and Kenneth L. McElwee
Defendant:
Aldersgate Life Plan Services, Inc, Aldresgate United Methodist Retirement Community, Inc., William Springs and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jones v. USA
as 5:2024cv00149
Petitioner:
Jermaine Carlton Jones
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Jones v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02050
Petitioner:
Hadie Markeith Jones
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Defendant:
Warden Basden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JONES v. DEJOY
as 1:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY JONES
Defendant:
LOUIS DEJOY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Jones v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
Sharon Lynn Jones
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Jones v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
Alan Delbert Jones
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Linden v. Advance Auto Parts, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
KAMA LINDEN
Defendant:
Advance Auto Parts, Inc., Carla J. Bailo, John F. Ferraro and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
