Cases 21 - 30 of 117
GOODENOUGH et al v. KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V. et al
as 2:2021cv01214
Plaintiff:
MARK GOODENOUGH, ROY HARDCASTLE, PHILIP ROACHE and others
Defendant:
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V., PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC and PHILIPS RS NORTH AMERICA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv03510
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
KEMP v. HOFFMAN et al
as 2:2021cv03447
Plaintiff:
CHERRI KEMP
Defendant:
KAYLA HOFFMAN, WALNUT STREET LESSEE L.P. D/B/A THE RADIAN, WALNUT STREET LESSEE L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
KEMP v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC.
as 2:2021cv00605
Plaintiff:
BRUCE KEMP
Defendant:
MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
KEMP v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC.
as 2:2021cv00595
Plaintiff:
BRUCE KEMP
Defendant:
MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HILLMAN v. COLLINGDALE BOROUGH OF PA et al
as 2:2021cv01676
Defendant:
COLLINGDALE BOROUGH OF PA, PA. PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION, SARGENTS COURT REPORTING SERVICE, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HILLMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DIXON et al v. ANDREWS et al
as 2:2021cv01476
Defendant:
GTL TRUCK LINES, INC. and KIM ANDREWS
Plaintiff:
TAHERRA HOLLIS, ZAKKIYAH MACK KEMP, TIERRA DIXON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WALKER v. END OF EPISODE, INC et al
as 2:2021cv00528
Defendant:
ATMOSPHEREENTERTAINMENT MM, LLC, AXN NETWORK, INC, G-UNIT FILM & TELEVISION, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
RAMONE CURTIS WALKER
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
KEMP v. SAUL
as 5:2020cv01228
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Plaintiff:
MARGIE L. KEMP
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
KEMP v. WALLACE 2ND SHIFT
as 1:2019cv00304
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL KEMP
Defendant:
WALLACE 2ND SHIFT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
