Cases 21 - 30 of 25,205
Batista Martinez v. Perez Bryant et al
as 6:2024cv01033
Plaintiff:
Juan Batista Martinez
Defendant:
Artavia Perez Bryant and CH2 Logistics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv02128
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Vargas-Perez v McDonough
as 3:2024cv01256
Plaintiff:
NOEL VARGAS-PEREZ and HON. DENNIS RICHARD MCDONOUGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv60949
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0451 Employment Discrimination
Kissimina et al v. Ed's Lobster Bar, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv04261
Plaintiff:
Nade Kissimina, Marilyn Roxana Pinargote Urbina, Pedro Franco and others
Defendant:
Ed's Lobster Bar, LLC and Edward McFarland
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 021
Santana-Perez v. Dixon
as 2:2024cv00521
Defendant:
Jesus Francisco Santana-Perez and Ricky Dixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eason v. Raoul et al
as 3:2024cv50220
Plaintiff:
Hannibal Eason
Defendant:
Kwame Raoul, The Illinois Attorney Generals Office, The Inspector General of Illinois and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03090
Plaintiff:
Rosenda Perez
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Delagarza et al v. El Centro Del Barrio
as 5:2024cv00613
Plaintiff:
Serena Delagarza, Ruben Ramos, Jr. and Erica Perez
Defendant:
El Centro Del Barrio doing business as Centromed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Perez-Chuello v. Garland
as 24-3508
Petitioner:
EYBBER JAVIER PEREZ-CHUELLO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
