Cases 21 - 30 of 857
Nelson v. UnitedHealth Group, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Annmarie Nelson
Defendant:
UnitedHealth Group, Inc., Golden Rule Insurance Company, Regional Medical Laboratory, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Nath et al v UnitedHealthcare et al
as 2:2023cv00245
Defendant:
Assurance IQ LLC Agent, UnitedHealthcare doing business as Golden Rule Insurance Company, Assurance IQ LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Essie Nath and Keith Nath
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
SMITH v. RULE
as 2:2023cv00580
Petitioner:
NICKOLAS SMITH
Respondent:
T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
CLARK v. RULE
as 2:2024cv00003
Petitioner:
IZIAH CLARK
Respondent:
T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
RULE 14 LLC v. UIPATH INC.
as 2:2023cv00627
Plaintiff:
RULE 14 LLC
Defendant:
UIPATH INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
TURNER v. RULE
as 2:2024cv00023
Petitioner:
BERNARD TURNER
Respondent:
T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
BROADWAY v. RULE
as 2:2023cv00571
Petitioner:
MARCUS BROADWAY
Respondent:
T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
SMITH v. RULE
as 2:2023cv00568
Petitioner:
MARCUS SMITH
Respondent:
T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Golden Rule Fasteners, Inc. v. The Neverleak Company, LP
as 1:2024pl35002
Counter Defendant:
Golden Rule Fasteners, Inc.
Defendant:
Neverleak Company, LP
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Golden Rule Fasteners, Inc. v. R.P. Lumber Co., Inc.
as 1:2024pl35001
Plaintiff:
Golden Rule Fasteners, Inc.
Defendant:
R.P. Lumber Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 183 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
