Cases 21 - 30 of 168
Acevedo v. Diaz
as 5:2022cv00038
Plaintiff:
Gerardo Acevedo
Defendant:
Dr. Horacio Diaz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
King v. Lubbock County et al
as 5:2022cv00080
Plaintiff:
Terrance King
Defendant:
Kelly Rowe, Well Path Medical Services, Sgt. Tracy Marie Sasin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wade v. City of Houston, Texas et al
as 4:2022cv01357
Plaintiff:
Erin Wade, Janie Torres, Brisenia Flores and others
Defendant:
City of Houston, Texas and Art Acevedo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Acevedo v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
as 5:2022cv00308
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Emanuel Clay Acevedo
Defendant:
Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Gonzales v. Hidalgo et al
as 4:2021cv04235
Plaintiff:
Carlos Gonzales
Defendant:
Lina Hidalgo, Ed Gonzalez, Art Acevedo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00298
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Acevedo v. Hibernia Resources III, LLC
as 4:2021cv03691
Plaintiff:
Hervey Acevedo
Defendant:
Hibernia Resources III, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Hughes v. City of Houston et al
as 4:2021cv01994
Defendant:
Harris County, Michael Garcia, James Seymour and others
Plaintiff:
Austin Thompson Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lasalle et al v. MDD Logistics Inc et al
as 3:2021cv01263
Defendant:
MDD Logistics Inc and Jose Salvador Ortiz Acevedo
Plaintiff:
Kayla Washington and Ebony Lasalle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Howard v. City Of Houston et al
as 4:2021cv01179
Defendant:
Nadeem Aslam, Thomas Serrano, City Of Houston and others
Plaintiff:
Aundre Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
