Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Joseph Johnson, Jr. v. Arne Duncan, et al
as 12-10184
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH JOHNSON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
AFFILIATED COMPUTER SERVICES INCORPORATED and ACS EDUCATION SOLUTIONS, L.L.C.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00300
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Joseph Johnson, Jr. v. Arne Duncan, et al
as 11-5067
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Joseph Johnson, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Arne Duncan, Secretary of the United States Department of Education and ACS Education Solutions, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00442
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Joseph Johnson, Jr. v. Arne Duncan, et al
as 10-5375
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Joseph Johnson, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Arne Duncan, Secretary of the United States Department of Education and ACS Education Solutions, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv01886
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fogley et al v. JP Morgan Chase & Co. et al
as 3:2010cv01721
Plaintiff:
Anees Robert Fogley and Karen Fogley
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase & Co. , ACS EDUCATIONAL LOAN SERVICES, LLC , COLLEGIATE FUNDING SERVICES INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. DUNCAN et al
as 1:2010cv01171
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH JOHNSON, JR.
Defendant:
ARNE DUNCAN and ACS EDUCATION SOLUTIONS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2010cv00117
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
McKay v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 2:2009cv01318
Plaintiff:
Matthew G McKay, Sr
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America Corporation, ACS Educational Services Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
