Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Clarke v. Stofft
as 9:2017cv80123
Petitioner:
Adam Richard Clarke
Defendant:
Kinsley Elizabeth Stofft
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Adam Richards, et al v. Ed Prieto, et al
as 11-16255
Amicus Curiae:
MAJOR CITIES CHIEFS ASSOCIATION, LAW ENFORCEMENT ACTION NETWORK, NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION, ADAM RICHARDS, CALGUNS FOUNDATION, INC. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF YOLO and ED PRIETO
SANBORN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2016cv04408
Plaintiff:
ADAM RICHARD SANBORN
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Brady v. John Goldman, Esq. et al
as 1:2016cv02287
Plaintiff:
James H. Brady
Defendant:
John Goldman, Esq., Justin Singer, Esq., Daniel R. Milstein, Esq. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Klyczek et al v. Shannon
as 1:2015cv00963
Plaintiff:
Adam Richard Klyczek and Housing Opportunities Made Equal, Inc.
Defendant:
Catherine Stramaglia Shannon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
USA v. Adam Watson
as 14-51146
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ADAM RICHARD WATSON, also known as Adam R. Watson
Richards v. Carefree Property Mangement, LLC et al
as 8:2014cv02452
Plaintiff:
Adam Richards
Defendant:
Carefree Property Mangement, LLC and David A. Napp
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Bank of America, N.A. v. Adams et al
as 3:2013cv01090
Plaintiff:
Bank of America, N.A.
Defendant:
Richard Adams and Adams Richard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud
Inge v. Echols et al
as 7:2012cv02495
Plaintiff:
Derrick Inge
Defendant:
Andrew Echols, Fred Rice, Tyree Murphy and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adam Richards, et al v. Ed Prieto, et al
as 11-16255
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ADAM RICHARDS, SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION, CALGUNS FOUNDATION, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ED PRIETO and COUNTY OF YOLO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
