Cases 21 - 30 of 86
County of Santa Clara et al v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 5:2021cv01655
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and Norris Cochran
Plaintiff:
Center for Science in the Public Interest, County of Santa Clara, National Association of Pediatric Nurse Practitioners and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
County of Santa Clara, et al v. USHHS, et al
as 21-70558
Petitioner:
AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION, NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, CENTER FOR SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST and others
Respondent:
NORRIS COCHRAN, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of Health and Human Services and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
American Academy of Pediatrics, et al v. EPA, et al
as 21-1060
Petitioner:
Natural Resources Council of Maine, American Academy of Pediatrics, American Public Health Association and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Jane Nishida, Acting Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor:
American Wood Council, State of Mississippi, State of Montana and others
American Lung Association v. EPA
as 21-1063
Petitioner:
American Lung Association
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
American Lung Association, et al v. EPA, et al
as 21-1027
Petitioner:
American Lung Association, Natural Resources Defense Council, National Parks Conservation Association and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Andrew Wheeler, Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company et al v. County of San Diego et al
as 3:2020cv01290
Defendant:
Helen N. Robbins-Meyer and County of San Diego
Plaintiff:
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company and Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company, Inc.
Amicus Curiae:
Public Health Law Center, African American Tobacco Control Leadership Council, American Lung Association and others
Petitioner:
Mental and Public Health Organizations
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
In re: American E-Liquid
as 19-2242
Defendant:
UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, ALEX M. AZAR, II, in his Official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services, NORMAN E. SHARPLESS, in his Official capacity as Commissioner of Food and Drugs and others
Appellant:
ARIZONA SMOKE FREE BUSINESS ALLIANCE, AMERICAN VAPING ASSOCIATION, OHIO VAPOR TRADE ASSOCIATION and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY CANCER ACTION NETWORK, TRUTH INITIATIVE, LEAH BRASCH and others
Amicus Curiae:
MICHAEL SIEGEL, STATE OF MARYLAND, WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION and others
American Academy of Pediatrics, et al v. Andrew Wheeler
as 20-1221
Petitioner:
Natural Resources Council of Maine, Downwinders at Risk, American Academy of Pediatrics and others
Respondent:
Andrew Wheeler, in his official capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency
ARIPPA v. EPA
as 16-1175
Petitioner:
ARIPPA
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor:
American Lung Association, American Public Health Association, Calpine Corporation and others
Amicus Curiae:
Cato Institute, Joel D. Blum, Celia Y. Chen and others
In re: Cigar Association
as 19-2130
Intervenor:
SMOKE-FREE ALTERNATIVES TRADE ASSOCIATION- TEXAS, NEW YORK STATE VAPOR ASSOCIATION, CIGAR ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STEVEN HIRSCH, MD, AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY CANCER ACTION NETWORK, LINDA GOLDSTEIN, MD and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, ALEX M. AZAR, II, in his Official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services and others
Appellant:
CIGAR RIGHTS OF AMERICA, PREMIUM CIGAR ASSOCIATION, f/k/a International Premium Cigar and Pipe Retailers Association and In re: CIGAR ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA
Amicus Curiae:
MARYLAND ASSOCIATION OF COUNTY HEALTH OFFICERS and STATE OF MARYLAND
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
