Cases 21 - 30 of 61
Marglon v. City of Sioux Falls Police Department et al
as 4:2019cv04115
Defendant:
Jeffrey Rech, Aaron Jensen, Shellie Slattery and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Gary Marglon, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marglon v. Child Protection Services et al
as 4:2018cv04156
Defendant:
Bridgette DeStigtev, Jackie Smidt, Child Protection Services and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Gary Marglon, Sr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Adams et al
as 4:2018mc00029
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Arthur Lamar Adams and Timber Properties, LLC
Maday v. Dooley et al
as 4:2017cv04168
Plaintiff:
Stanley J. Maday
Defendant:
Bob Dooley, Dennis Kaemingk, Mary Carpenter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
London v. Miller et al
as 4:2017cv04165
Plaintiff:
Laura London
Defendant:
Darrell Miller, Steve Smith, Scott Powers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw v. Kaemingk et al
as 4:2017cv04116
Plaintiff:
James Elmer Shaw
Defendant:
Dennis Kaemingk, Robert Dooley, Darin Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Roberts County et al
as 1:2017cv01013
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Shane Adams
Defendant:
Roberts County, Jay Tasa and Melessia Medberry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caskey v. South Dakota State Penitentiary et al
as 4:2017cv04070
Plaintiff:
Cody Ray Caskey
Defendant:
South Dakota State Penitentiary, Dooley and Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv04068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4303
OPD Holdings, LLC et al v. Otiko et al
as 4:2017cv04042
Plaintiff:
Steven J. Keough, OPD Holdings, LLC and Kasten, Inc. doing business as Dakota Life Sciences
Defendant:
Christopher Ayo Otiko, D. Howard Phillips, ViaDerma, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
