Cases 21 - 30 of 64
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00300
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Employment Discrimination
City of Los Angeles v. Time Warner Cable Inc et al
as 2:2014cv01984
Plaintiff:
City of Los Angeles
Defendant:
Does, TW NY Cable Holdings Inc, Time Warner Cable Enterprises LLC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv01696
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01259
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv01021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Pier v. Advance/Newhouse Partnership
as 8:2013cv01052
Plaintiff:
Roland Pier
Defendant:
Advance/Newhouse Partnership
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Kevin Waine-Golston, et al v. Time Warner Entertainment-Adva
as 13-55622
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN WAINE-GOLSTON and ANDRE CORBIN, individually and on behalf of other members of the public similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
TIME WARNER ENTERTAINMENT-ADVANCE/NEWHOUSE PARTNERSHIP
Brown v. Time Warner Cable, Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv00353
Plaintiff:
Earl Brown
Defendant:
Time Warner Cable, Inc. , Time Warner Entertainment - Advance/Newhouse Partnership and Time Warner Entertainment Company, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-10413
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00005
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
