Cases 21 - 30 of 55
Torres et al v. Choi's Potisman Cleaner, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv09963
Plaintiff:
Alberto Torres
Defendant:
Choi's Potisman Cleaner, Inc. , Potisman Cleaners of New York, Inc. , Potisman Cleaners, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Torres v. The Kosher Garden Market Place Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv03046
Defendant:
The Kosher Garden Market Place Inc. and Joel Weinstock
Plaintiff:
Alberto Torres
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
CitiMortgage Inc. v. Torres-Sullivan et al
as 3:2017cv01336
Plaintiff:
CitiMortgage Inc.
Defendant:
Carlos Alberto Torres-Sullivan and Haydee Gonzalez-Morales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Antonio Espinoza-Torres v. USA
as 17-70287
Petitioner:
ANTONIO ESPINOZA-TORRES, AKA Tonio, AKA Alberto Torres-Mendoza
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Luis Torre
as 16-50496
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
LUIS ALBERTO TORRES
Torres et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv01835
Plaintiff:
Eda Torres and Alberto Torres
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TORRES v. ORIGINAL PITA GRILL, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv00767
Plaintiff:
JOSE ALBERTO TORRES
Defendant:
ORIGINAL PITA GRILL, LLC and NICHOLAS ANDELORA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Torres v. L & R Structural Corp., Inc., et al
as 1:2015cv24473
Plaintiff:
Luis Alberto Torres Torres
Defendant:
L & R Structural Corp., Inc. , Hi-Rite Woods I Inc, Carlos Marquez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Torres et al v. Hacienda Madrigal, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv01629
Plaintiff:
Alberto Torres , Claribel Ramirez and Melisa Torres-Ramirez
Defendant:
Hacienda Madrigal, Inc., ABC Insurance Companies and Does I-X
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TORRES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2014cv00647
Plaintiff:
ALBERTO TORRES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
