Cases 21 - 26 of 26
Cellularvision Technology & Telecommunications LP v. Alltel Corporation et al
as 4:2007cv00444
Plaintiff:
Cellularvision Technology & Telecommunications LP
Defendant:
Alltel Corporation, Alltel Corporation, Alltel Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
BRASE v. ALLTEL COMMUNICATIONS INC
as 4:2007cv00089
Plaintiff:
AARON BRASE
Defendant:
ALLTEL COMMUNICATIONS INC and ALLTEL COMMUNICATIONS INC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Cellularvision Technology & Telecommunications, L.P. v. Alltel Corporation et al
as 2:2007cv14020
Plaintiff:
Cellularvision Technology & Telecommunications, L.P., Cellularvision Technology & Telecommunications, L.P. and Cellularvision Technology & Telecommunications, L.P.
Defendant:
Alltel Corporation, Alltel Communications, Inc. and Alltel Wireless Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0145 Patent Infringement
Tyler v. Alltel Corporation et al
as 4:2007cv00019
Plaintiff:
Heather Tyler, Heather Tyler, Heather Tyler and others
Defendant:
Alltel Corporation, Alltel Corporation, Alltel Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
MLMC LTD V AIRTOUCH COMMUNICATIONS
as 02-1611
Defendant/Cross Appellant:
360 COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, AIRTOUCH COMMUNICATIONS, INC., ALLTEL COMMUNICATIONS INC. and others
Plaintiff-Appellant:
MLMC, LTD.
Cell Telecom, et al v. FCC, et al
as 02-1264
Petitioner:
Cellular Telecommunications & Internet Association and Cellco Partnership, doing business as Verizon Wireless
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Intervenor For Petitioner:
Cingular Wireless LLC, Rural Telecommunications Group, Dobson Communications Corporation and others
Intervenor:
National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners, Verizon Telephone Companies, Contel of the South, Inc., doing business as Verizon Mid-States and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
