Cases 21 - 30 of 3,347
Huckins, Jr. v. Amazon.com Services LLC
as 2:2024at00664
Plaintiff:
Ryan M. Huckins, Jr.
Defendant:
Amazon.com Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Milkes et al v. Amazon.com Services LLC
as 2:2024cv00728
Plaintiff:
Michael Milkes and Shari C. White
Defendant:
Amazon.com Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Amin, M.D. v. O'Brien et al
as 5:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Dr. Mahendra Amin, M.D.
Defendant:
Rachael O'Brien, Morbid: A True Crime Podcast LLC doing business as Morbid Network, Wondery, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
McGill et al. v. Prudential Insurance Company of America et al.
as 1:2024cv00916
Plaintiff:
Megan McGill and Shannon McGill
Defendant:
Prudential Insurance Company of America, Amazon.com Services LLC and Gerald McGill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-20220
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Su v. Amazon.com Services LLC
as 24-3260
Petitioner:
JULIE A. SU, Acting Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor
Respondent:
AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC
Long v. Amazon.com Services LLC
as 24-3257
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL E. LONG
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04255
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
ENDRES v. AIR CANADA, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00883
Plaintiff:
STEVEN ENDRES and STEVEN P. ENDRES
Defendant:
AIR CANADA, INC., AIR FRANCE-KLM S.A., ALASKA AIR GROUP, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Heinz v. Amazon.com Inc
as 2:2024cv00714
Plaintiff:
Brian Heinz, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
