Cases 21 - 30 of 39
United States v. Angel Acosta-Patina
as 15-3190
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Angel Acosta-Patina
Curtis v. Beseler et al
as 3:2013cv01352
Plaintiff:
C. William Curtis
Defendant:
Rick Beseler , Angel Acosta , Jared Bludsworth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Acosta v. Unitrans S.A. de C.V. et al
as 1:2012cv00234
Plaintiff:
Jose Angel Acosta, Jr.
Defendant:
Unitrans S.A. de C.V. and Jose Mora
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Joe Acosta, III v. Pople, et al
as 11-50890
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOE ANGEL ACOSTA, III
Defendant - Appellee:
POPLE, Officer, Security Threat Group Investigator, CHANEY, Senior Warden, FOX, Major and others
Joe Acosta, III v. Pople, et al
as 11-20561
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOE ANGEL ACOSTA, III
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICER POPLE, Security Threat Group Investigator, SENIOR WARDEN CHANEY, MAJOR FOX and others
Joe Acosta, III v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 11-40599
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOE ANGEL ACOSTA, III
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Acosta III v. Unknown Administrative Segregation Supervisor et al
as 9:2011cv00020
Plaintiff:
Joe Angel Acosta III
Defendant:
Unknown Administrative Segregation Supervisor, Unknown UTMB Medical Rounds Nurse and Unknown Security Escorts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Acosta et al v. HealthSpring of Florida, Inc.
as 1:2010cv23311
Defendant:
HealthSpring of Florida, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Angel Acosta and Maria T Acosta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Acosta III v. Director TDCJ ID
as 9:2010cv00096
Petitioner:
Joe Angel Acosta III
Respondent:
Director TDCJ ID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
USA v. Angel Acosta
as 10-50281
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ANGEL ACOSTA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
