Cases 21 - 30 of 30
MARTIN v. BEDWELL et al
as 2:2023cv00286
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
SARAH BEDWELL, DENTIST, BOBBI RIGGS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. CLARKE et al
as 2:2023cv00282
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
SARAH CLARKE, MARY BETH RUTH-SIMS, SARAH BEDWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. BONNER et al
as 2:2023cv00267
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
BONNER, RUTH MARY SIMS, SARAH CLARKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. VANIHEL
as 2:2023cv00254
Petitioner:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Respondent:
FRANK VANIHEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MARTIN v. HOLCOMB et al
as 2:2023cv00078
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
CHRISTHOPER HOLCOMB, VARTHEL, RUSSELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. WELLINGTON et al
as 2:2023cv00083
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
THOMAS WELLINGTON, WILMORE, CARPETTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. DONOVAN et al
as 2:2023cv00058
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
NICHOLAS DONOVAN, MARK SMITH, ADAM JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2022cv00470
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, KEVIN GILMORE, THOMAS WELLINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2022cv00120
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, K. GILMORE, THOMAS WELLINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doe v. Daniels et al
as 2:2013cv00307
Plaintiff:
Dr Jon M Doe
Defendant:
Mitch Daniels, Mamon Powers, Howard Cohen and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
