Cases 21 - 30 of 123
TORRES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv16214
Plaintiff:
GELSON ANTONIO TORRES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
TORRES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv11492
Plaintiff:
JOSE ANTONIO TORRES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Torres v. Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv01203
Petitioner:
Israel Antonio Torres
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
The Estate of Jose Antonio Torres-Martino, et al v. Fountain Christian Bilingual School Carolina Inc., et al
as 22-1209
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THE ESTATE OF JOSE ANTONIO TORRES-MARTINO, represented by Raul Cintron-Rodriguez and RAUL CINTRON-RODRIGUEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
FOUNTAIN CHRISTIAN BILINGUAL SCHOOL CAROLINA INC., FREDDY ABDUL-SANTIAGO, FOUNTAIN CHRISTIAN BILINGUAL SCHOOL INC. and others
USA v. Torres Marrufo
as 22-50189
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jose Antonio Torres Marrufo, also known as Jaguar, also known as Tonin, also known as Catorce, also known as 14, also known as Tono, also known as El Uno
USA v. Wilber Torres-Pineda
as 21-12832
Defendant / Appellant:
WILBER ANTONIO TORRES-PINEDA, a.k.a. Yiyo
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
DLJ Mortgage Capital Inc. v. Torres et al
as 3:2021cv01346
Plaintiff:
DLJ Mortgage Capital Inc.
Defendant:
Jose Carlos Torres, Orlando Antonio Torres, Jenny Marrero Ortiz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Antonio Torres-Simon v. Merrick Garland
as 21-70524
Petitioner:
ANTONIO TORRES-SIMON
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Torres v. RNK Jewelry, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00195
Defendant:
Jin Kim and RNK Jewelry, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jose Antonio Torres
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Rivera v. Saul
as 3:2020cv02324
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Jose Antonio Torres Rivera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
