Cases 21 - 30 of 247
Bedwell v. Dollar General Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv00101
Plaintiff:
Phillip Bedwell
Defendant:
Dollar General Corporation and Susan Cox Kentucky, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
MARTIN v. SIMMERMAN et al
as 2:2023cv00385
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
SIMMERMAN, MARK SMITH, CHRISTOPHER HOLCOMB and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WARD v. CENTURION HEALTH SERVICES LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00369
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. WARD
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH SERVICES LLC, BOBBI RIGGS, SARA BEDWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ELDER v. BEDWELL et al
as 2:2023cv00337
Defendant:
BOBBIE RIGGS, DANIEL BEDWELL, BARBRA and others
Plaintiff:
LLOYD T. ELDER, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. BEDWELL et al
as 2:2023cv00286
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
SARAH BEDWELL, DENTIST, BOBBI RIGGS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. CLARKE et al
as 2:2023cv00282
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
SARAH CLARKE, MARY BETH RUTH-SIMS, SARAH BEDWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. BONNER et al
as 2:2023cv00267
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
BONNER, RUTH MARY SIMS, SARAH CLARKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
POPE v. BYRD et al
as 2:2023cv00240
Plaintiff:
BRYCE POPE
Defendant:
SAMUEL BYRD, BEDWELL, BARBARA RIGGS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GREENLEE v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2023cv00127
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY GREENLEE
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, KEVIN GILLMORE, DICK BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SWANN v. BYRD et al
as 2:2023cv00112
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE SWANN
Defendant:
BYRD, BOBBIE RIGGS and DANIEL BEDWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
