Cases 21 - 30 of 230
Allan et al v. Minnesota Department of Human Services et al
as 0:2020cv01980
Plaintiff:
Steven Hawkins, Patrick Otten, Maikijah Hakeem and others
Defendant:
Nancy Johnston, Jodi Harpstead, Marshall Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Maddox III v. Sather et al
as 0:2020cv00645
Defendant:
Sara Johnson, John Grey, Ebenezer Tope Adebara and others
Plaintiff:
Harry Maddox III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Friend v. Swanson et al
as 0:2012cv00248
Plaintiff:
Terrance Friend
Defendant:
Lori Swanson, Governor Dayton, Dennis Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hatton et al v. Harpstead et al
as 0:2019cv02837
Defendant:
Christine Sell, Sharon Olson, Mark Deutsch and others
Plaintiff:
Peter Allan, Russell Hatton and Michael Benson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benson v. Werner Enterprises, Inc. of Nebraska et al
as 0:2019cv02883
Defendant:
Werner Enterprises, Inc. of Nebraska, Jessica Vanarsdale and Werner Enterprises
Plaintiff:
Amanda Benson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Larson v. Minnesota Department of Human Services, The et al
as 0:2019cv02811
Defendant:
Nathan John Madsen, Jesse D. Berglund, Minnesota Sex Offender Program, the and others
Plaintiff:
Hollis J. Larson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benson v. C.R. Bard Inc. et al
as 0:2019cv02480
Defendant:
Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C.R. Bard Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jackson Benson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Kolb et al v. McClary et al
as 0:2019cv02088
Plaintiff:
Deborah Kolb and Timothy Kolb
Defendant:
Arizant Healthcare, Inc, Jason Shaw, Jennifer Hicks and others
Benson v. Menard, Inc.
as 0:2019cv02183
Defendant:
Menard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Patricia Benson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Miles v. Schiller et al
as 0:2019cv01914
Defendant:
John Does, Robert Rose, Shelby Hall and others
Plaintiff:
Gordon Miles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
