Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Sawant v. Ramsey
as 12-3926
Plaintiff:
Anil Sawant, Enrique Jose Contreras, Jose Suarez and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Radar Devices Inc., Anastasia Michos, Diana L. Nassaney and others
Defendant:
Geoffrey W. Ramsey, Roger Lockhart and Peter Sarmanian
Defendant - Appellant:
David J. Murphy
James v. Varreen et al
as 2:2012cv02724
Plaintiff:
Curley Emanuel James, Jr
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Defendant:
A W Varreen, A W Clay, Bouns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sawant v. Ramsey
as 12-3034
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Anil Sawant, Radar Devices Inc., Enrique Jose Contreras and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Geoffrey W. Ramsey, David J. Murphy, Roger Lockhart and others
Boun Rattanavong v. United State
as 11-2472
Movant - Appellant:
Boun Rattanavong
Respondent - Appellee:
United States of America
Labelle v. Reinke et al
as 1:2011cv00247
Plaintiff:
Timothy J Labelle
Defendant:
Brent Reinke, Shannon Cluney, Diane Boune and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coach, Inc. et al v. Just A Boun, LLC et al
as 6:2011cv00797
Plaintiff:
Coach, Inc. and Coach Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Just A Boun, LLC, Justin Bounauito, Christina Bounauito and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Jensrud v. Bouns et al
as 1:2011cv01516
Plaintiff:
Jesse Lee Jensrud
Defendant:
T Bouns, Ballard, G Jenkins and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00591
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Sawant v. Ramsey
as 10-4253
Plaintiff:
Anil Sawant, Boune Ome Rahanavong, Per F. Fjortoft and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Radar Devices Inc., Enrique Jose Contreras, Jose Suarez and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Geoffrey W. Ramsey, David J. Murphy, Peter Sarmanian and others
Rattanavong v. USA
as 4:2010cv00923
Respondent:
USA
Movant:
Boun Rattanavong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
