Cases 21 - 30 of 7,701
BROWN v. COOPER et al
as 2:2024cv01308
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND C. BROWN
Defendant:
LAKEISHA COOPER, MARCOS ORTIZ, MICHAEL SHILLINGFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDONALD v. MARSH et al
as 1:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
JOHN MAURICE McDONALD
Defendant:
ROBERT MARSH, SUPERINTENDENT RANDY IRWIN, MAJOR DEAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Witt
as 5:2024cv01280
Plaintiff:
Pamela L. Brown
Defendant:
Isaac G. Witt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
LU v. KERRY et al
as 2:2024cv01169
Plaintiff:
FRIEDRICH LU
Defendant:
CAMERON F KERRY, UNITED STATES, MERRICK GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
DOE v. CRISTINI et al
as 2:2024cv00336
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
R. CRISTINI, E. HURD, D. COULEHAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. PA Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00445
Plaintiff:
Kamil T. Brown
Defendant:
PA Department of Corrections, Laurel Harry, Kehoe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. HAINSWORTH et al.
as 3:2024cv00049
Petitioner:
DOUGLAS BROWN
Respondent:
MELISSA HAINSWORTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SILVERBERG v. DUPONT DE NEMOURS INC. et al
as 2:2024cv00924
Plaintiff:
RICHARD J. SILVERBERG
Defendant:
DUPONT DE NEMOURS INC., DOW, INC., CORTEVA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
BROWN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2024cv01019
Plaintiff:
RA' SHEEN J BROWN
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY SETH WILLIAMS, CAROLYN NAYLOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00867
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
