Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Theiss v. Burger King Restaurant, et al
as 5:2011cv00787
Defendant:
Carrols Corporation , Burger King Restaurant and John/Jane Doe Employees 1-10
Plaintiff:
Jean Theiss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Green v. Carrols Restaurant Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv23471
Plaintiff:
Rose Green
Defendant:
Carrols Restaurant Group, Inc., Pollo Operations, Inc. and Carrols Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv01031
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00604
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
WELTER et al v. BURGER KING CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv01526
Plaintiff:
JEAN WELTER and ROBERT WELTER
Defendant:
BURGER KING CORPORATION , BURGER KING OF PA & NJ, INC. and CARROLS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hernandez v. Burger King Corporation et al
as 3:2010cv00226
Plaintiff:
Kathy Hernandez
Defendant:
Burger King Corporation and Carrols Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv02979
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Carrols Corporation v. Mid-Toll, Inc., et al
as 3:2007cv03302
Plaintiff:
Carrols Corporation, Carrols Corporation, Carrols Corporation and others
Defendant:
Mid-Toll, Inc., and CFJ Properties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Carrols Corporation v. Cain Restaurant Company
as 2:2007cv10947
Plaintiff:
Carrols Corporation, Carrols Corporation, Carrols Corporation and others
Defendant:
Cain Restaurant Company
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:1998cv01772
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
