Cases 21 - 30 of 52
BAUM-BRUNNER v. MARTIN et al
as 2:2020cv00800
Defendant:
JUSTINE MCDANIEL, PHILADELPHIA INQUIRER/CEO, CHRISTOPHER KOPECKI and others
Plaintiff:
BAUM-BRUNNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
El Mitchkebe Kebechet El v. Dimon et al
as 3:2019cv02223
Defendant:
Merscorp Holdings Inc., CEO James Dimon, Sterns Lending LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Princesa Candelita El Mitchkebe Kebechet El
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
GREENE v. GRAAF et al
as 2:2019cv04734
Defendant:
KENNETH HOLDSMAN, JONATHAN VAN DUSEN, VERIZON NETWORK and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN GREENE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00166
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00118
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
MILLER et al v. RITTER et al
as 2:2018cv04647
Defendant:
CEO MICHAEL C. RITTER, TURTLE-ROLLS AUTO, MICHAEL C. RITTER and others
Plaintiff:
SOLOMON M MILLER and JENNIFER DIXON-MILLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CURRY v. CARBOFIX ORTHOPEDICS, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv00634
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CURRY
Defendant:
CARBOFIX ORTHOPEDICS, INC. , CARBOFIX IN ORTHOPEDICS LLC , PITANGO TRUST LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01838
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
EVANS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2016cv03276
Plaintiff:
JAMES D. EVANS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA, DEFENDERS ASSOCIATION OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BILINSKI v. WILLS EYE HOSPITAL et al
as 2:2016cv02728
Plaintiff:
RONALD JOSEPH BILINSKI
Defendant:
WILLS EYE HOSPITAL, WILLS EYE INSTITUTE, WILLS EYE OPHTHALMOLOGY CLINIC INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
