Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 68
Carlos Tronco-Garcia v. William Barr, U. S. Atty Gen
as 19-60387
Petitioner: CARLOS CESAR TRONCO-GARCIA
Respondent: WILLIAM P. BARR, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cervantes v. Ndoh
as 3:2018cv02886
Respondent: Ndoh
Petitioner: Cesar Adrian Garcia Cervantes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jose Macias Garcia v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 18-60616
Petitioner: JOSE CESAR MACIAS GARCIA
Respondent: JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Gomez-Garcia v. USA
as 2:2018cv00042
Petitioner: Julio Cesar Gomez-Garcia
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Capitol Specialty Insurance Co v. Daydreams Inc, et al
as 17-2550
Plaintiff - Appellant: CAPITOL SPECIALTY INSURANCE CORP
Defendant - Appellee: DAYDREAMS INC, STEPHEN ROSEN, HUMBERTO MEDINA-RODRIGUEZ and others
Type: Contract Insurance
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2017cv00279
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Garcia v. Pollard We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00693
Petitioner: Cesar O Garcia
Respondent: William J Pollard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CAPITOL SPECIALTY INSURANCE CORPORATION v. DAYDREAMS, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv04796
Plaintiff: CAPITOL SPECIALTY INSURANCE CORPORATION
Defendant: DAYDREAMS, INC. , STEPHEN ROSEN , HUMBERTO MEDINA-RODRIGUEZ and others
Counter_claimant: STEPHEN ROSEN and DAYDREAMS, INC.
Counter_defendant: CAPITOL SPECIALTY INSURANCE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Type: Contract Insurance
Ortega-Baldis v. USA (2255 2:15-cr-086 JAM)
as 2:2016cv01314
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Cesar Hernandez-Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Gomez-Garcia v. USA
as 2:2016cv00041
Petitioner: Julio Cesar Gomez-Garcia
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?