Cases 21 - 29 of 29
James Scott, et al v. Kevin Reif, et al
as 15-1859
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES SCOTT, HELEN SCOTT and JAMES SCOTT, d/b/a Best Way Auto
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICER KEVIN REIF, LIEUTENANT RAY COLLINS, CITY OF REDFORD POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Marianne Guzall, et al v. City of Romulus, et al
as 14-2543
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARIANNE GUZALL
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF ROMULUS, ALAN R. LAMBERT and BETSEY KRAMPITZ
BEANS v. CITY OF ROMULUS et al
as 1:2011cv00203
Plaintiff:
DAVID SHERMAN BEANS
Defendant:
CITY OF ROMULUS, PAM MATHY and MAGISTRATE DAVID PEEBLES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv14956
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Beans v. City of Romulus
as 5:2010cv01275
Plaintiff:
David Sherman Beans
Defendant:
City of Romulus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Beans v. City of Romulus
as 5:2010cv00770
Plaintiff:
David Sherman Beans
Defendant:
City of Romulus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
International Metal Trading In, et al v. City of Romulus, et al
as 10-1205
Plaintiff - Appellant:
INTERNATIONAL METAL TRADING INCORPORATED and PAUL TERRAULT
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF ROMULUS, Michigan
John Hamilton, et al v. City of Romulus, et al
as 09-2196
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN HAMILTON, JOHN HAMILTON, JR., JEREMY HAMILTON and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF ROMULUS, MARC ABDILLA, MICHAEL ONDEJKO and others
Defendant:
GOVERNOR OF MICHIGAN
International Metal Trading Inc et al v. City of Romulus, Michigan et al
as 1:2008cv01052
Plaintiff:
International Metal Trading Inc, International Metal Trading Inc, Paul Terrault and others
Defendant:
City of Romulus, Michigan, Charles Kirby and Joshua Monte
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
