Cases 21 - 30 of 110
Turuc v. State of Illinois et al
as 3:2020cv03235
Plaintiff:
James Turuc
Defendant:
State of Illinois, Kwame Raoul, Ashley Clement and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Almendariz v. OneSpan Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv04906
Defendant:
OneSpan Inc., Mark S. Hoyt and Scott Clements
Plaintiff:
Judith Almendariz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Blaylock et al v. Twin Restaurant, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv04648
Plaintiff:
Rachel Anderson, Susan Winfield, Johnae Farr and others
Defendant:
Twin Restaurant Franchise, LLC, Twin Restaurant Warrenville, LLC, Twin Restaurant Investment Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Clement v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 3:2020cv00043
Plaintiff:
Crystal Clement
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and Walmart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Brown v. Shaw et al
as 1:2019cv07694
Defendant:
Clements, Sgt. Davenport, Sherwin Miles and others
Plaintiff:
Kenyatta Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lamon v. Korte et al
as 3:2019cv03228
Defendant:
Stephen Bradshaw, Jeffrey Korte, Ryan Bailey and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Lamon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Singleton v. Huff et al
as 3:2019cv03052
Plaintiff:
Avery Singleton
Defendant:
Doctor Atwood Huff and Ashley Clement
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clement v. National Collegiate Athletic Association, et al
as 1:2019cv01195
Plaintiff:
Mario Clement
Defendant:
National Collegiate Athletic Association and The Catholic University of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Singleton v. Huff et al
as 3:2019cv03037
Defendant:
. Sandhu, Ashley Clement, . Sudbrink and others
Plaintiff:
Avery Singleton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Liebich v. Illinois Department Of Corrections et al
as 1:2019cv00242
Defendant:
Illinois Department Of Corrections, Cayman Wilcox, Officer Shevlin and others
Plaintiff:
Randy R. Liebich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
