Cases 21 - 30 of 98
Crawford v. Brooks et al
as 3:2019cv00711
Defendant:
Latasha Brooks, Dean Epps, Sheila Parks and others
Plaintiff:
Tedra Crawford
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
L.L.D., LLC et al v. Enpro Industries, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00046
Plaintiff:
Jennie M. Clement, Robert O. Walker, 2 Hill LLC and others
Defendant:
Enpro Industries, Inc., Samuel G. Williamson, Goodrich Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Crawford v. DeSoto County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2019cv00013
Plaintiff:
Paul Crawford
Defendant:
DeSoto County, State of Mississippi, Officer John Doe II, DeSoto County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Crawford et al v. Berger
as 1:2019cv00022
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Crawford and Michael Crawford
Defendant:
Brad Berger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Crawford v. State of Mississippi
as 1:2018cv00212
Respondent:
State of Mississippi
Petitioner:
Tedra Crawford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Crawford v. Rivers
as 3:2018cv00776
Petitioner:
Shakeem Horatio Crawford
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Respondent:
C. River
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Casillas v. USA
as 1:2018cv00313
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Adan Casillas
Material Witne:
Karl Crawford Hightower
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Crawford v. Rivers
as 3:2018cv00659
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
C. Rivers
Plaintiff:
Shakeem Horatio Crawford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Brown v. Nash et al
as 3:2018cv00624
Defendant:
Captain Crawford, Dr. Martinez, Lt. Louglery and others
Plaintiff:
Leonard Brown
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Okorie v. Mississippi Board of Medical Licensure et al
as 3:2018cv00179
Plaintiff:
Ikechukwu Hyginus Okorie
Defendant:
Mississippi Board of Medical Licensure , Virginia Crawford , Jonathan Dalton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
