Cases 21 - 30 of 57
Francis v. The Municipal Court of Wake County et al
as 5:2018ct03338
Defendant:
Janet M. Leggett, The Municipal Court of Wake County, Howard Cummings and others
Plaintiff:
Egbert Francis, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2018cv00122
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson et al v. Buncombe Co. N.C. et al
as 1:2018cv00099
Plaintiff:
LaShawn Lamont Johnson and Bradley A. Thomas
Defendant:
Buncombe Co. N.C., Walter D. Cum, Jr., Tenn. Board of Parole and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Toney v. Hillis et al
as 5:2017cv00262
Plaintiff:
Antonio D Toney, II
Defendant:
Jonathan M Hillis and John Doe Cummings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Toney v. Hillis et al DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE. SEE 5:17-CV-262-FL
as 4:2017cv00073
Plaintiff:
Antonio D Toney, II
Defendant:
Jonathan M Hillis and John Doe Cummings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CUMMINGS v. RAHMATI, ET AL.
as 1:2017cv00329
Plaintiff:
JOHN D. CUMMINGS
Defendant:
NEVZETA RAHMATI, HABIBOLLAH RAHMATI, NC AUTO DEALER INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cummings v. TRS Recovery Services, Inc.
as 7:2015cv00188
Plaintiff:
Sherry Cummings
Defendant:
TRS Recovery Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
CUMMINGS v. POWELL et al
as 1:2015cv00545
Plaintiff:
JOHN D. CUMMINGS
Defendant:
CATHY POWELL, CROSS POINT CHURCH OF GREENSBORO, CLINT S. MORSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WINFREE et al v. WOS et al
as 1:2015cv00245
Plaintiff:
CORPORATION OF GUARDIANSHIP, INC. , STEPHEN SINCLAIR WINFREE and MARION F. WINFREE
Defendant:
ALDONA ZOFIA WOS and ROBIN G. CUMMINGS, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
