Cases 21 - 30 of 38
ARNOLD v. CUPP et al
as 2:2022cv00253
Plaintiff:
KEANDRE ARNOLD
Defendant:
CUPP, SIMS, KERIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRINTUP v. CENTURION HEALTH et al
as 2:2022cv00221
Plaintiff:
DARIUS PRINTUP
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH, LAUREN CUPP, SAMUEL BYRD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEYERS v. RINEHART et al
as 2:2022cv00140
Plaintiff:
KEVIN MEYERS
Defendant:
RINEHART and C. CUPP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2022cv00120
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, K. GILMORE, THOMAS WELLINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROSA v. WEXFORD et al
as 2:2022cv00078
Plaintiff:
RAFAEL ROSA, III
Defendant:
WEXFORD, WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, MARTINEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRINTUP v. WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2022cv00003
Plaintiff:
DARIUS PRINTUP
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, ARAMARK CORR SERVICES LLC, DAVID BEDWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ARNOLD v. WARDEN et al
as 2:2021cv00459
Plaintiff:
KEANDRE ARNOLD
Defendant:
WARDEN, POPE, BENIFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARNOLD et al v. ROZIJIA et al
as 2:2021cv00447
Plaintiff:
KEANDRE ARNOLD
Defendant:
ROZIJIA, CHAPLIN ROGERS, OFFICER RICHARDSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AMOS v. BYRD et al
as 2:2021cv00264
Defendant:
NURSE KIMBERLY HOBSON, NURSE L. CUPP, WEXFORD CORR. SERV. and others
Plaintiff:
ROYAL AMOS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rosenbourgh v. La Porte Superior Court 1
as 3:2021cv00494
Defendant:
Jaime Oss, James Cupp, Bethany J Beckman and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Antonio Rosenbourgh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
