Cases 21 - 30 of 479
Avery et al v. Kent County et al
as 1:2023cv00929
Plaintiff:
Kellie Sinke, Deborah J. Parker, Peter Avery and others
Defendant:
Kent County, Peter MacGregor, Kenneth D. Parrish and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Other Civil Rights
Whitney v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00688
Plaintiff:
Ian Campbell Whitney
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of Social Security Decision (DIWC)
Campbell v. O'Reilly Auto Enterprises, LLC
as 1:2023cv00619
Plaintiff:
CHARLES CAMPBELL
Defendant:
O'REILLY AUTO ENTERPRISES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Dye #149800 v. Washington et al
as 2:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Dye #149800
Defendant:
Heidi E. Washington, Sherman Campbell, Unknown Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris et al v. Wayne et al
as 2:2023cv10986
Plaintiff:
Nicole Harris, Blanca Arguelles, Amber Baldwin and others
Defendant:
Wayne, County of, Officer Terri Graham and Terri Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Polen IV v. Tanner
as 2:2023cv10889
Petitioner:
Samuel Polen IV
Respondent:
Sherman Campbell and Jeff Tanner
Dobronski v. Krause and Kinsman Law LLC et al
as 2:2023cv10541
Defendant:
Patricia Lynn Campbell, Joanna Bernadette Orcheln, Krause and Kinsman Law LLC Doing business as Kruase & Kinsman Law Firm Doing business as Krause and Kinsman Group, LLP and others
Plaintiff:
Mark W Dobronski
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Page v. Campbell et al
as 2:2023cv10180
Plaintiff:
Ivan Page
Defendant:
S. Campbell, Bobon and Mr. Thomas
Adams v. Laskey et al
as 2:2023cv10108
Plaintiff:
Raymond W. Adams
Defendant:
Laskey, Tofil, Campbell and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
