Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Cassidy v. Colvin
as 3:2016cv08286
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Plaintiff:
James Cassidy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Strole v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2016cv03325
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio, Fulton Brock, Don Stapley and others
Plaintiff:
Cassidy James Strole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Strole v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2016cv02902
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio, Fulton Brock, Don Stapley and others
Plaintiff:
Cassidy James Strole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joe Hand Promotions Incorporated v. Cassidy et al
as 2:2012cv02237
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions Incorporated
Defendant:
Lynn Cassidy, Mark Kristen and Maduro's Fine Cigar and Tobacco LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Communications Act of 1934
Slep-Tone Entertainment Corporation v. Backstage Bar and Grill et al
as 2:2012mc00078
Plaintiff:
Slep-Tone Entertainment Corporation
Defendant:
Backstage Bar and Grill, Eight Ball Enterprises Incorporated , Caffe Brass Monkey and others
Cassidy v. United States Marshals Service
as 2:2011cv02326
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Cassidy
Defendant:
United States Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Riess v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2010cv01331
Plaintiff:
Richard Steven Riess
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio, Unknown Eastlund, Unknown Wiscombe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Craig v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2009cv01995
Plaintiff:
Bobby Woods Craig, Jr.
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Maricopa, County of, Phoenix, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zep Inc. v. Brody Chemical Company, Inc., et al
as 2:2009cv00505
Plaintiff:
Zep Inc., Zep Inc. and Zep Inc.
Defendant:
Brody Chemical Company, Inc., Mark Bartley, Neil Carse and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Booth v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2008cv01764
Plaintiff:
Jerrod Len B. B. Booth
Defendant:
Joe Arpaio, James Garstson, I.L.S. Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
