Cases 21 - 30 of 40
Charles Parke v. USDC-MBU
as 12-70885
:
In re: CHARLES BERNARD PARKE
Petitioner:
CHARLES BERNARD PARKE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA, BUTTE
Real Party In Interest:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Parke et al v. Glover et al
as 2:2011cv00639
Plaintiff:
Charles Rodney Parke , Parke Properties, LLC and Land Investments Properties, Inc.
Defendant:
Ed Glover and Valley Creek Land Company of York, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Charles Parke v. City of Butte, et al
as 11-35900
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES BERNARD PARKE
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF BUTTE, SILVER BOW POLICE DEPT., JOHN WALSH, Sheriff and others
Parke v. USA
as 2:2011cv00058
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Charles Bernard Parke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Charles Parke v. City of Butte, et al
as 11-35679
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES BERNARD PARKE
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF BUTTE, SILVER BOW POLICE DEPT., JOHN WALSH, Sheriff and others
Parke v. State of Idaho et al
as 1:2011cv00011
Plaintiff:
Charles Bernard Parke
Defendant:
State of Idaho, City of Kootenai County, Idaho, City-County of Boise, Idaho and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parke v. City of Butte et al
as 2:2010cv00042
Plaintiff:
Charles Bernard Parke
Defendant:
City of Butte , Silver Bow Polilce Dept. , Sheriff John Walsh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parks v. Chappell et al
as 2:2010cv01804
Plaintiff:
Charles Austin Parks
Defendant:
- Chappell and C. Bakewell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Parks v. SWVRJA Superintendent
as 10-6511
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES BRANDON PARKS
Respondent - Appellee:
SWVRJA SUPERINTENDENT, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF VIRGINIA and BOB MCDONNELL
Charles Parks v. Randall Lowe
as 10-6508
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES BRANDON PARKS
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDALL LOWE, ROY F. EVANS, JR., COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
