Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Wang v. De Jesus et al
as 4:2010cv04629
Petitioner:
Charles Wang
Respondent:
Carlos De Jesus, State CDCR Head, Dept of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ferraro v. Wang
as 1:2010cv04356
Plaintiff:
Dominic Ferraro
Defendant:
Charles Wang
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Wang v. Tanyan Smith, et al
as 10-15768
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES WANG
Respondent - Appellee:
TANYAN SMITH, KENNETH SHAPIRO, Judge, ADMIR ALUM, Asst. D.A. and others
Wang v. Pulido et al
as 4:2010cv01453
Plaintiff:
Charles Wang
Defendant:
David Pulido, Alvarez, Joy Maulitz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Charles Wang v. David Pulido, et al
as 10-15549
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES WANG
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID PULIDO, SHARKEY, PAUL STARRETT and others
Wang v. Pulido et al
as 4:2009cv03549
Petitioner:
Charles Wang
Respondent:
David Pulido, Sharkey, Paul Starrett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hybrid Kintetic Automotive Holdings, Inc. et al v. Hybrid Kinetic Automotive Corp. et al
as 3:2009cv00035
Plaintiff:
Hybrid Kinetic Automotive Holdings, Inc., Hybrid Kinetic Automotive Holdings, Inc., American Compass, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Hybrid Kinetic Automotive Corp., Xiaolin (Charles) Wang, Xi (Jack) Deng and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
WANG et al v. CHUCK E CHEESE et al
as 1:2009cv00158
Plaintiff:
PETER WANG, KIMBERLY ANN BOWERS WANG, CHARLES WANG and others
Defendant:
CHUCK E CHEESE and KEN MCGILL
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Wang v. Smith
as 3:2008cv02692
Petitioner:
Charles Wang
Respondent:
Tanyan Smith, Kenneth Shapiro, Admir Alum and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Charles Wang v. Monterey Park Police Department
as 2:2007cv06188
Plaintiff:
Charles Wang
Defendant:
Monterey Park Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
