Cases 21 - 30 of 53
LOCKWOOD v. FAMILY et al
as 1:2017cv01344
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDRIA JORDAN LOCKWOOD
Defendant:
FAMILY, DEBORAH SOUTHARD, RICK LOCKWOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook v. City of Tyler, Texas et al
as 6:2017cv00333
Plaintiff:
Kerry Max Cook
Defendant:
City of Tyler, Texas, Smith County, Texas, Eddie Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00116
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2017cv00143
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States of America v. City of Tyler, Texas
as 6:2017cv00029
Defendant:
City of Tyler, Texas
Plaintiff:
United States of America and State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319
Michael Williams v. EPA, et al
as 16-40359
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL E. WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, GINA MCCARTHY, MATTHEW MCCARTHY and others
Matthews v. City of Tyler, Texas et al
as 6:2015cv00954
Plaintiff:
Dedrick Matthews
Defendant:
City of Tyler, Texas, 114th District Court, Texas Department of Criminal Justice-CID and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lamar Advantage Outdoor Company, L.P. v. The City of Tyler Texas
as 6:2015cv00865
Defendant:
The City of Tyler Texas
Plaintiff:
Lamar Advantage Outdoor Company, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
WILLIAMS v. Environmental Protection Agency et al
as 6:2015cv00862
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL E WILLIAMS
Defendant:
Environmental Protection Agency, Gina McCarthy, Matthew McCarthy and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Cotten v. City of Tyler, Texas et al
as 2:2015cv00520
Plaintiff:
Joseph Cotten
Defendant:
City of Tyler, Texas, Gary M. Swindle, Steve Sharron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
